Jump to content

Mr. Claus Abt

Moderators
  • Content Count

    258
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Mr. Claus Abt last won the day on January 6

Mr. Claus Abt had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

14 Good

1 Follower

About Mr. Claus Abt

  • Rank
    Moderator

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

1627 profile views
  1. Hej Gustaf, Can you create a ticket in the helpdesk https://helpdesk.caeses.com/ and share your project file, please? Looks like the parametrization is different to what you would like to achieve. The ruled surface connects the curves at the same parameter values, hence you can manipulate them by changing the parametrization, e.g. unit speed or even custom. Cheers Claus
  2. HI Jake, Can you send the propeller file again? I can not find it in my archives.
  3. Please insert a reasonable knotspacing value in the BRep and datareduction afterthe transformation. The transformation might otherwise rip the geometry apart, since it moves the control points of the vessels representation. In the flat of bottom area there might be only a few and that needs to be refined. Cheers Claus
  4. The reference points for the trimming did not hit the Brep. Alos,is there any reason why you took 2000 sections for the bottom surface? TestSWAN_v2_trimmed.cdbc
  5. Jake, Ceyhan is not in the office these days. Will take a little until he responds 😕 Best Regards Claus
  6. Hi Jake, I received your question, unfortunately I am a bit busy theses days ... I'll come back to you.
  7. Hi George, I took the liberty to reduce the number of sections for the metaSurface a little to get the performance a little better. Your chosen number might have slowed it down and potential later operations take long and might fail. If you select the hull Brep, you will find two sprayrail as operations. If you define a feature that has a Brep as typeProvider, and the first argument is a FBrepBase you can use that as an operation, which will make your project pretty slim. For the Chine, I also generated a new surface as a RuledSurface from the upper edge of the metaSurface and a trimmed imageCurve of the side Brep. Cheers Claus TestSWAN_v2_SR.cdbc
  8. Thanks, I have responded by email. Did you get it? Cheers Claus
  9. HI Jake, can you send me the step file? info@friendship-systems.com would work for that. Cheers Claus
  10. Yes! We usually define normalized parametric section definitions, therefore all controls are relative to C. This does not hold for skew, rake and pitch, those inputs are blade parameters, not section parameters.
  11. You can write the value in a separate file if you want. If you look up the code snippet for "write file" in the feature editor, you should get a hint how you can write a file.
  12. Thickness is not only normalized by R but also by Chord. So it is t/c. Best Claus
  13. For the horizontal flat parts you could just remove the surfaces and extrude the edges to the centerplane.
  14. Gaps usually affect the meshing/CFD process, no matter if they are in the original or modified parts.
  15. The model is unfortunately very bad. There are big gaps between several surfaces. I will see if I can find a repaired one. Best Regards Claus
×
×
  • Create New...