Jump to content

Creating Lighter and More Effi­cient Radial Turbines

lighter_radial_turbine_mtu

In our research project GAMMA we closely work together with MTU Friedrichshafen to optimize com­po­nents of large tur­bocharg­ers. Nicolas Lachen­maier, one of the leading aero­dy­nam­ics engi­neers at MTU, uses CAESES® for the design of the turbine com­po­nents. He provides a few insights into the com­plex­ity of turbine wheel design.

Inter­view with Nicolas Lachen­maier, MTU

Hi Nicolas! What is your academic/​career back­ground, how did you find your way to MTU Friedrichshafen?

Nicolas: I’ve earned a Bachelor’s degree in Math­e­mat­ics and received a Master’s degree in Com­pu­ta­tional Engi­neer­ing in 2014. As my hometown lies close to Friedrichshafen, applying to MTU was a natural choice. Fur­ther­more, I started working on tur­bo­ma­chin­ery within my Master thesis at BMW. So MTU’s offer to work as CFD engineer in the field of radial turbines matched my pro­fes­sional expe­ri­ences and plans quite well. 

What are your respon­si­bil­i­ties at MTU Friedrichshafen ?

Nicolas: MTU is devel­op­ing tur­bocharged diesel and gas engines for off-highway appli­ca­tions. I am taking care of the aero­dy­namic design of the radial turbines within the engines’ tur­bocharg­ers, i.e. I’m design­ing new, more effi­cient turbines with the help of CFD methods and eval­u­at­ing exper­i­men­tal results from the test stand.

Stress calculation of the radial turbine blade based on the CAESES model

What projects are you cur­rently working on? 

Nicolas: My main focus cur­rently lies on the gov­ern­ment-funded research project GAMMA. It is my task to create an auto­mated opti­miza­tion and design chain that helps creating lighter and more effi­cient radial turbines with high durability.

Pressure distribution, visualized on the full radial turbine rotor

What are the engi­neer­ing chal­lenges when you develop a new tur­bocharger turbine?

Nicolas: From the engines per­spec­tive the turbine effi­ciency is probably the most impor­tant design cri­te­rion. Modern CFD codes are doing a good job helping the designer to decide whether an improve­ment is to be expected. However, main­tain­ing the struc­tural integrity of the turbine wheel while con­tin­u­ously raising its effi­ciency is a tough chal­lenge: Assuring that the stresses remain low and the eigen­fre­quen­cies high while max­i­miz­ing the effi­ciency without increas­ing the inertia of the wheel can be, well, tedious.

Temperature distribution on the turbine blade

How does CAESES® support you in this task?

Nicolas: In close col­lab­o­ra­tion with FRIEND­SHIP SYSTEMS AG we have built up a CAESES® model of a radial turbine that enables us to judge a new turbine design from several per­spec­tives very early in the design phase: The geometry model allows us to perform CFD based aero­dy­namic cal­cu­la­tions as well as all the sim­u­la­tions revolv­ing around the mechan­ics of the geometry. We run an eigen­fre­quency analysis, have a closer look at the tem­per­a­ture and cen­trifu­gal force induced stresses and finally cal­cu­late the center of mass and inertia of the wheel.

What do you like about CAESES®? 

Nicolas: I enjoy how the software is specif­i­cally designed to enable and accel­er­ate an auto­mated geometry gen­er­a­tion for opti­miza­tion purposes.

Any future ideas for the use of CAESES® in your department?

Nicolas: Well, I do hope that we’ll use the tool for the design of new water pumps in the future.

Parametric fluid domain that is part of the radial turbine model in CAESES

By using CAESES®, we could mas­sively bring down our turbine design cycle from several months to only a few weeks.

Nicolas Lachenmaier
Engineer for Fluid Dynamics and Thermal Analysis

The New Design Process at MTU

Through the use of para­met­ric CAESES® models at MTU, a much larger set of physical quan­ti­ties can now be computed auto­mat­i­cally in a single loop. Most of the time-con­sum­ing manual iter­a­tions between the strength and aero­dy­nam­ics depart­ments in the early stage of a design are now elim­i­nated. The fol­low­ing table gives you a com­par­i­son of which quan­ti­ties were avail­able in the former turbine design process and after CAESES® was fully inte­grated into the workflow:

BEFOREAFTER

Aero­dy­nam­ics

Efficiency
Axial Thrust

Rotor Dynamics

Mass of Turbine Body
Axial Position of Center of Mass

Tran­sient Behaviour

Blade Inertia: Precise Calculation
Turbine Inertia: Precise Calculation

Low Cycle Fatigue

Tem­per­a­ture Field
Stresses due to Rotation
Stressed due to Trans­mit­ted Torque
Stresses due to Tem­per­a­ture Gradients

High Cycle Fatigue

Eigenfrequencies

Burst

Burst Speed
Burst Energy

Download Tech Brief

A short summary of this case study can be found in this tech brief (PDF).

More Infor­ma­tion

Thanks a lot to Nicolas and MTU Friedrichshafen for sharing these insights. More infor­ma­tion about turbine wheel design includ­ing some ani­ma­tions can also be found in the case study Turbine Blade Opti­miza­tion includ­ing Scallops. General infor­ma­tion about tur­bo­ma­chin­ery design with CAESES® can be found in the tur­bo­ma­chin­ery section.

With kind per­mis­sion of MTU Friedrichshafen

Shape control for turbine wheel scallops

More articles

Latest from the blog

All articles

Stay up to date

Receive latest news to your inbox.

Subscribe to newsletter