Jump to content

Mr. Paul Riesen

Members
  • Content Count

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Mr. Paul Riesen

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. :)  Yes, that’s is. Thanks for the food for thoughts…
  2. Hi Joerg,   thanks for the quick reply! I use the “bladeanalysis(…)” Feature.   If I understood you correctly my camber value for r/R=0,2 is 8% of the radius?   And the max thickness value is 26,8%?   All other values match the 2D plots. What could be the reason for these unsatisfying results?   Many thanks in advances! Paul    
  3. Hi,   I am currently working on my bachelor thesis. The Blade Analysis Tool is quit useful for me. The only thing is that I can’t get the max camber value out of the analysis. Looks like the max camber value and max thickness are not a value/distance but a distribution over chord length?!? If I measure the max thickness from the 2D-Plot I get the same results like the PPF gives. Unfortunately, the PPF does not come with the camber value. How do I get the value without plotting everything and measure everything? Then FFW could optimize also with a Lifting Line Code.   Regards, Paul
  4. Actually why are using XPAN? You don’t need the potential calc. because it is submerged. You can use XCHAP only, isn’t it?!?
  5. Hi Shiju,   have you managed to run a propulsion computation of your subm? I am working on my bachelor thesis. Therefore I need to get the propulsion results of an AUV. Would you mind to help me with your configuration data specifically for the propul. calc.? Resp. did you use the ITTC78 command?   Would be great! Regards, Paul
×
×
  • Create New...