Jump to content
Adam

Exporting Geometry to STAR-CCM+ as a part instead of assembly

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am currently modelling a turbofan blade passage for optimisation and use in STAR-CCM+. When I export as a step file it appears as an assembly in STAR-CCM+ and I cannot replace the part for the optimisation automation.

I believe it to be an error in my modelling. I have made separate surfaces (e.g. Inlet, Outlet, Blade surface etc.) but am not sure if they have been connected properly to be used as a singular part ready to be exported as the Domain into STAR-CCM+.

Any help with uniting the surfaces would be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards

Adam

FAN3.cdbc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Adam,

take a look at BReps -- they are the way to go when combining, uniting, substracting, etc. various parts of your geometry. For boudary conditions you can make use of colors (their names) which can be applied robustly even when topologiacal changes occur in the model during shape variation. You should be able to find everything to get started within the help menu of CAESES.

Cheers,
Heinrich

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Heinrich,

I have tried what you have suggested and works except for one of the surfaces in my geometry. The blade I have modelled was done using Meta Surface, and this seems to be causing me the majority of issues even when using a Brep or solid from intersection. I have exported the blade on it's own into STAR CCM+ and still shows as an assembly even though there is only a singular part.

image.png.5214456966ef67468682f81ed4fc4deb.png

Is there anything else I could try?

Cheers,

Adam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Heinrich,

I am using the STEP (STAR-CCM+) export option, and yes I have tried highlighting the final subscope which only included the object I wanted. in the project I have made a final subscope named: '05_Final Domain' in which I created a Brep which included all parts of my model from other subscopes into one part. (I believe this is the right method, correct me if I am wrong) 

Cheers 

Adam

FAN4.cdbc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Adam,

that looks promising already. When combining everything, you need to distinguish between boolean operations and simply adding sources. I went through your model and corrected a few things -- mostly adding the domain faces one-by-one using individual "add sources" operations. While doing so, I colored each operation so that your inlet/outlet/periodics, etc are colored reliably. I did the same for the blade and extruded and closed it to obtain a closed solid (you don't want any open/red edges and your final BRep should be closed > you can tell it is closed from it's icon being filled with grey color). Then there is only one boolean operation: substracting the closed blade from the closed domain. Since the blade and tip are already colored, the colors will "imprint" onto your domain during that operation.

image.png.974d80d641920484818a712e1af0a11d.png

Hope this helps. Cheers,
Heinrich

FAN4_HvZ.cdbc

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...